Can you believe it was 20 years ago today that Olympic skater Nancy Kerrigan was attacked? Such a bizarre sequence of events. Almost like something out of one of my suspense novels. With the Winter Olympics just one month away, I’ve been thinking more about this case. The events happened in Detroit, where I was living at the time.
You remember the story, don’t you? The day before the U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Detroit, Tonya Harding’s ex-husband and her bodyguard allegedly hired a man to strike Kerrigan in the leg with a police baton. Folks said Harding wanted her rival out of the competition in time for the Olympics. Was that true?
Harding claimed she had no involvement in the attack. Under threat of a lawsuit by Harding, the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) allowed Harding to continue and compete in the Olympics.
Despite the attack, which bruised Kerrigan’s leg, Kerrigan took home the silver. Harding finished eighth.
Media reports say the ex-husband, the bodyguard, the attacker, and a getaway car driver did prison time for the attack. It’s been reported that Harding pleaded guilty to hindering the investigation and escaped jail time.
The only evidence I’ve heard against Harding was testimony from her ex-husband, Jeff Gillooly. He allegedly told FBI agents that Harding approved the plan to attack Kerrigan 10 days before it happened.
As I review the case today, 20 years later, I wonder how things would have played out differently today. Gillooly’s attempts to destroy evidence apparently included burning magazine pages and faxes. Today, destroying the evidence would be even easier — deleting a text message, for example. But would computer forensic scientists have been able to retrieve such deleted evidence?
What about Tonya Harding? The lawsuit she filed against the USOC contended that she had not been charged with a crime, that the USOC didn’t have the power to discipline her, and that she would be denied due process of law if a USOC hearing were held. Would more advanced FBI technology today have persuaded the USOC to remove Harding from the team? Or, once again, would a threatened lawsuit be enough to change the USOC’s decision? Would Harding have been disqualified?
I’d love to hear your opinion! As always, thanks for reading!
All I can say is Harding must have had a very good lawyer to have gotten off with no jail time. I have never been able to understand why people after pleading guilty (because they did do it) not just to this crime, get off with a lighter sentence. What are both doing now any ideas.
Lynne, usually the reason they plead guilty is because they have made an agreement with the prosecutor for a lighter sentence before hand. I don’t know if that’s what happened here, but probably. I don’t know where they are now, but that’s a good question! Maybe we can find out. Stay tuned…..
I loved Nancy Kerrigan – and if it was 20 years that means I was only 12! I cried when she didn’t get gold because she SHOULD have because Oksana fell (twice?), at least once on her hand. Nancy Kerrigan had a perfect performance, with the exception of turning a triple luxe into a double. I was proud of her for getting the silver and pretty smug when Tanya got eighth. Crime never pays. 1994. Favorite Winter Olympics to date.
I remember when this happened, but it’s crazy to know it was 20 years ago already! I was a huge fan of figure skating growing up and I remember the footage on the news of both girls crying. My mom and I were glued to the TV. It’s curious what would happen now with advancements in technology. My personal opinion is she shouldn’t have been allowed to compete. Seems like there was enough connection to show she was aware of the crime. What a horrible thing to do. I much prefer the underdog story of Oksana Baiul.